*If the independent subcontractor already has a subcontractor in mind, they can skip this step. This is the menu of how to get the work done on your project. Extremely detailed, it reflects how you would do the work so that those who do the technical work replace you in the project. The Subcontractor thus releases the Contractor, its members, collaborators and representatives and shall each of them indefy from any loss, claim, damage, liability, costs or expenses resulting from (i) the work product or the provision of services under this Agreement, (ii) a breach of this Agreement by the Subcontractor, its staff; 1992, 1995 representatives, related enterprises and/or subcontractors, and (iii) any act or omission of subcontractors, its employees, representatives, related companies and/or subcontractors in the provision of services under this Agreement. When drafting the agreement, the independent contractor and the subcontractor are required to agree on those responsible for the following points: the general rule is that a contractor (or subcontractor) can claim from the owner the damages resulting from the delay or obstruction of the owner. In response, landlords often insert into the main contract a no-delay clause that excludes claiming damages for the delay caused by the landlord. This also applies to subcontractors through the application of the flow through clause. Instead of consequential monetary damages, the downstream parties limit themselves to extending the deadline for completion of the project. Of course, this absolutely cannot remedy this situation, especially if the subcontractor has committed most, if not all, of its resources to this project and is unable to maintain its schedule for the next project. In addition, no delay clauses are generally not affected by the requirements for appropriate termination. On the contrary, when a subcontractor is confronted with this provision, it should insist that it be expressly limited by situations involving fraud, misrepresentation, bad faith or active interference by the owner, and that it does not address delays that would otherwise justify the abandonment of the project, or, better still, that it only applies to the types of delay, which are specifically described in the agreement (which are all the usual legal exceptions to these clauses).
. . .